Yesterday evening I had the immense pleasure of gathering with about a dozen others in the Al Green theatre to watch the very very very fresh-from-the-editing-room final cut of NEXT: A Primer on Urban Painting. Pablo Aravena was in attendance, and the man was just beaming, four years’ worth of crazy travel stories and interviews and bombing international walls having finally come together in one fluid, share-able product. His eyes were dancing, and you could tell that he couldn’t wait to get back out there.
This isn’t “just another graffiti documentary”. Though some of the sequences were shot years and continents apart, NEXT managed to capture this intense, quiet dialogue between the artists in each locale. São Paulo had something to say to Osaka had something to say to Amsterdam had something to say to Montréal. There’s so much I’d love say (and I could probably wax poetic for hours like some disconnected art school kid), but for now there are two sections in particular that stand out for me:
1) the footage from Paris, where they go crawling through soppy, crumbling tunnels deep deep below city streets, scribbling on walls side-by-side 19th century tags;
2) the section on pixacão — a real badass, highly stylized form of writing native to Brasil. I kind of wish this part of the story had been extended, but I guess I’ll just have to wait for the DVD extras. That, or travel to São Paulo myself. Pablo, I’m there if you need a translator! Let’s make it happen!
There’s almost no mention of hip hop in the film, except for a few off-hand references toward the end, which I was grateful for. It’s a fine and smart piece of work, with Sixtoo & Moonstarr & other lovelies on the soundtrack, and I look forward to seeing it blow up. The site is out of date something awful, but go check some of the clips and images for a teaser.
- - -
It’s always tricky when you step into someone else’s territory and attempt to appreciate or understand or capture their culture. It’s something I’m sure Pablo was very aware of when he dragged his camera and microphone across four continents; he already had something very big in common with all of the people and places he featured in his film, but all of their stories and images were ultimately filtered and presented through his eyes. It’s something I’m trying to be careful of as well with this new project I’ve got going on the side, Beautiful Struggle. (And it’s something I wish some of the paler patrons of Thymeless reggae Saturdays would be more conscious of too, because I stopped in last night for a few jams, and that crowd’s attitude was just painful.)
This outsider-peeking-in pet peeve is in part what fuels my hateration for 90% of the arts & culture writers or reporters I’ve encountered over the years. Some professional distance is definitely important for many forms of journalism, but in no way does your journalist status give you an unlimited, all-access pass to write on what you please. I don’t mean to say you need to be down-since-the-eighties to draw up a fifty-word blurb on the new Bow Wow movie, but I’m tired of these bland hip hop academics and herbs trying to write in-depth features and “think” pieces with little more than a one-dimensional, out-dated understanding of the culture to go on. I find it absurd and insulting. Do we need more outsiders, with their pre-conceptions and mislead (and misleading) cheap tactics, writing more simple cliches about such large, complex subjects? Do we need any more stories that start out like: “Unlike the popular hip hop artists of today, who glorify a lifestyle of violence and bling, MC XYZ is different…” I really do applaud musicians for their patience in having to give so many cookie-cutter interviews to cookie-cutter writers who write cookie-cutter articles, because I know I would banannners from being asked the same dry, uninspired questions over and over. And these journalists’ sense of entitlement especially… oh gosh.
Music journalism is just so funny to me. Why don’t I write about jazz or drum ‘n bass? Because I don’t know anything about either one, I would be a shitty jazz or DnB writer, and nuff people who DO know something about these genres would call me out in a second. So why do these know-nothing herbs insist on claiming instant expert status? It does nothing for their credibility, nothing for the readership, and absolutely nothing for the cultural movement being highlighted. Very few people will question this practice — except for k-os, bless him. Every time he writes an editorial or a letter blasting another writer’s ignorance, my heart swells with the slightest, softest touch of joy. Checks and balances.
I guess the point I’m driving at is: if you’re not in a position to teach me anything, why should I listen to you? Why should anyone listen to you?
Not that I would ever consider myself an authority on any subject — and I’m not hating because I’m bitter, but more because I’m ashamed of how low some of the standards have become. I’m ashamed that possessing a degree from a j-school is good enough for so many people. I’m ashamed that not enough care and understanding is going into people’s work. Mind you, I’m usually quick to watch what I say and where I say it, knowing full well that there’s always at least a few people around that can teach me a thing or two about what I’m doing. I feel like I knew a lot more about music before I stopped doing college radio, and I fell off quite a bit when I stepped out of that intense little environment. I’m so anxious to step back up, to learn more, to love harder.
Anyway, I’m hardly articulating this properly, and probably getting myself into trouble for being so mouthy. It’s been a crazy week and things are only going to get crazier over the next month. I desperately need the following things:
#1 A get-rich-quick scheme.
#2 To get rich, quick.
#3 A new place to live.
#4 Office space.
#5 The cure for writer’s block.
Holler if you’ve got the hook-up.